Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: APPS-2471 Add a "Related Records" metadata fieldadd related record field #1131

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 9, 2023

Conversation

jendiamond
Copy link
Member

@jendiamond jendiamond commented Nov 1, 2023

Connected to: APPS-2471 & Californica PR 945

Acceptance criteria:

  • Create a new metadata field with the label "Related Records"

  • This field should accept only ARKs.

  • On ingest to Californica, the the ARK value should just go into this field and create a human_readable_related_title field

  • When displaying on the Item Page in Ursus and Californica, we want to make related titles clickable and linking to its item page

  • This field is only to be used to provide a URL to a related item within digital.library.ucla.edu

property related_record
label Related Records
predicate http://id.loc.gov/ontologies/bibframe/accompaniedBy
required no
multiple yes (new line)
type string (accepts ARKs only)
import from Related Record
searchable no
faceted no
search results hide
item view show
grouping Notes
oai_dpla dc:description
importer guide Related Records

@jendiamond jendiamond self-assigned this Nov 1, 2023
@jendiamond jendiamond force-pushed the APPS-2471_add-related-records-metadata-field branch from 7056dc1 to 369b7b8 Compare November 1, 2023 23:35
@pghorpade pghorpade self-assigned this Nov 9, 2023
@sourcefilter sourcefilter merged commit c55e90f into main Nov 9, 2023
8 checks passed
@sourcefilter sourcefilter deleted the APPS-2471_add-related-records-metadata-field branch November 9, 2023 18:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants